www.ranjca.com


	[email protected] 040-6655 2655


	Prologue Team Ranj Key Offerings Get in Touch Knowledge Bank Calculators GST Calculator Tax Calculator TDS Calculator Calculate Net Profit Calculate Net Worth Effective Capital HRA NSC EMI Auto Loan Calculator Home Loan Calculator Get No. Of Instalment Bulletins Notification Circular Income Tax Company Law Service Tax Excise Matters Customs RBI SEBI FEMA Labour Laws Central Sales Tax Accounting Standards The LLP Act 2008 Accounting Standard (INDAS) Others GST VAT Telangana VAT Tamil Nadu VAT IGST UTGST Compensation Cess Utilities Rates of TDS TDS Rates for N.R.I us 195 Rates of Income Tax Cost Inflation Index Rates of NSC Interest Gold and Silver Rates Rates of Depreciation Under Income Tax Act Rates of Depreciation Under Companies Act ROC Fee Structure (As per Companies Act, 2013) ROC Filing Fees (As per Companies Act, 2013) Application & Petition Fees (NCLT) Rates of Stamp Duty Limited Liability Partnership Fees National Industries of Classification IFSC Codes MICR Codes HSN Rate List Comparison of Deduction u/s 80TTA & 80TTB Links Quick Links Important Links GST/VAT Links Ease Of Doing Business Acts Direct Tax Income Tax Act Wealth Tax Act Income Declaration Scheme 2016 Indirect Tax Service Tax(Finance Act, 1994) The Central Excise Act, 1944 Customs Act, 1962 Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 Entry Tax Act Corporate Laws Companies Act, 2013 Companies Act, 1956 The Limited Liability Partnership ACT, 2008 The Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 VAT Laws Delhi Value Added Tax Act, 2004 Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act (2002) Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003 Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005 Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005 The Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Act 2008 West Bengal Value Added Tax Act, 2003 Punjab Value Added Tax Act Haryana Value Added Tax Act Telangana VAT Act 2005 Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003 Tamilnadu VAT ACT, 2006 Other Statutes The Indian Partnership Act, 1932 Societies Registration Act, 1860 Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934 Competition Act, 2002 Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969 Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 The Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 The Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 Profession Tax Act Right To Information Act, 2005 Equalisation Levy Act, 2016 The Insolvency And Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority and Rules THE REAL ESTATE (REGULATION AND DEVELOPMENT) ACT, 2016 GST Laws IGST Act , 2017 Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Union Territory Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 GST (Compensation to States) Act, 2017 Rules Direct Tax Rules Income Tax Rules Wealth Tax Rules 1957 Income Declaration Scheme Rules 2016 Indirect Tax Rules Customs Valuation Rules Service Tax Rules Central Sales Tax (Delhi) Rules, 2005 Central Sales Tax (Maharashtra) Rules Entry Tax Rules Cenvat Credit Rules, 2017 GST Valuation Rules , 2016 Corporate Laws Rules Companies Rules, 2014 The Companies Unpaid Dividend Rules, 1978 Limited Liability Partnership Rules, 2009 LLP Winding up Rules, 2012 VAT Laws Rules Delhi Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 Maharashtra Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 Haryana Value Added Tax Rules, 2003 Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 The West Bengal Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 The Uttar Pradesh Value Added Tax Rules, 2008 Punjab Value Added Tax Rules Rajasthan Value Added Tax Rules, 2006 Bihar Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 Karnataka Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 Telangna VAT Rules 2005 Gujarat Value Added Tax Rules, 2006 Tamilnadu VAT Rules, 2007 Other Statutes Baggage Rules, 2016 Profession Tax Rules NBFC Acceptance of Public Deposits (Reserve Bank) Directions, 1998 NBFC and Miscellaneous Non-Banking Companies (Advertisement) Rules, 1977 NBFC Auditor’s Report (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2008 Delhi Labour Welfare Fund Rules, 1997 Cost records and audit Rules, 2014 Equalisation Levy Rules, 2016 NCLT And NCLAT Rules The Insolvency and Bankruptcy of India Rules GST Rules Central Goods and Services Tax Rule, 2017 Forms Income Tax Forms Wealth Tax Forms ROC Forms (As per Companies Act, 1956) Companies Unpaid Dividend Forms Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) LLP Winding up Service Tax Forms NBFCs Forms FEMA Forms ROC Forms (As per Companies Act, 2013) Income Declaration Forms VAT Forms DVAT Forms MVAT Forms Bihar VAT Forms Karnataka VAT Forms UPVAT Forms Haryana VAT Forms WB Vat Forms Punjab VAT Forms Tamil Nadu VAT Forms CGST Forms GST Forms Accounts and Records Advance Ruling Appeals and Revision Assessment and Audit Composition Demands and Recovery Input Tax Credit Inspection, Search and Seizure Offences and Penalties Payment of Tax Refund Registration Returns Transitional Provisions Value of Supply News Query Careers Admin Login Time Sheet

govt goes all out for Aadhaar

More departments to approach Supreme Court for review of interim order; PM Narendra Modi to personally review Aadhaar enrolment

Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government are pulling out all the stops to ensure that the Aadhaar number doesn’t lose relevance in the face of a legal challenge to its use.

On Wednesday, soon after his return from the US, Modi called a meeting of state secretaries as well as other stakeholders in the Aadhaar unique identity number programme and asked them to push ahead with their enrolment initiative. The Prime Minister asked the states to complete the enrolment by December; he will personally review the progress every month. Thus far, 920 million people have been enrolled in the project.

A government official familiar with the matter said the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai), Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority, Pension Fund Regulatory and Development Authority and the state governments of Maharasthtra, Jharkhand and Chhattisgarh will also seek a review from the Supreme Court of its 11 August interim order restricting the use of Aadhaar to paying subsidies for the public distribution system and cooking gas

UIDAI, RBI, Sebi move Supreme Court on Aadhaar Govt seeks review of Supreme Court’s Aadhaar order. That follows Tuesday’s united defence of Aadhaar in the Supreme Court by the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi), Reserve Bank of India (RBI) and the state of Gujarat—all, again, sought a review of the order, which has jeopardized the government’s Digital India plan as well as the country’s move to a cashless economy.

In total, there will be 11 such review petitions, the official added, speaking on condition of anonymity.

On Tuesday, the bench adjourned the hearing to 6 October and is likely to decide whether the case can now be heard by the same three-judge bench or if it should be heard by a larger constitution bench to which the case has been referred. Supreme Court chief justice H.L. Dattu is yet to notify the constitution of a larger bench to hear the matter. The 11 August interim order did not ask the government to stop the process of enrolment.

Rarely have so many regulators and state governments approached the Supreme Court for such a review.

A second person familiar with the developments who spoke on condition of anonymity said that apart from highlighting the utility of Aadhaar, this is also a move to clearly delineate the powers of the executive from those of the judiciary. Indeed, over the past decade, courts have repeatedly stepped into the realm of policy-making—something that the Modi government hopes to stop.

Interestingly, while addressing the Indian community at SAP Centre in San Jose, California, on Monday, Modi emphasized the utility of Aadhaar in saving subsidies given for liquefied petroleum gas cylinders. He had said that India is moving ahead with “JAM of all”, short for Jan Dhan (a scheme to give people no-frills bank accounts), Aadhaar and mobile governance. He also said that giving a unique number to each citizen will help eliminate duplication in providing government benefits.

Under the Aadhaar-based direct benefit transfer (DBT) for LPG, or Pahal Scheme, so far 142.5 million beneficiaries have received Rs.25,795.93 crore in their bank accounts since the scheme was relaunched in November 2014. The government expects to save Rs.15,000 crore in leakages in LPG subsidy every year.

Also, as reported by Mint on 25 September, the government expects to save 40% of the subsidy through DBT in foodgrains, which will be an annual saving of around Rs.50,000 crore (mintne.ws/1KC83qG).

A Trai official who did not want to be identified confirmed that the telecom regulator was moving an application before the Supreme Court on the subject. The regulator wants a clarification on whether telecom subscribers can use Aadhaar as identity proof. As of July 2015, the total mobile subscriber base of the country was 983.21 million.

The first government official said that states have been directed to set up camps in schools and maternal and child welfare centres, especially in rural areas, to enrol children in the Aadhaar programme.

“Out of the 350 million or so people who do not have Aadhaar, around 250 million are people below the age of 18 years. This population does not have proper government identity and the enrolment drive will focus on this. The Prime Minister believes that Aadhaar is a transformational tool and an enabler,” the official said.

Of the 920 million Aadhaar enrolments, 240 million have been done after the current National Democratic Alliance government came in to power in May 2014, said the first government official quoted above.

As of now, Aadhaar number has been seeded for various government schemes such as Jeevan Pramaan, DigiLocker, scholarships, Jan Suraksha Schemes, passports and voter’s identity cards, among others.

The Supreme Court’s 11 August order came in response to several petitions that questioned whether the mandatory use of Aadhaar for various government welfare schemes discriminates against those who don’t have the number, and concerns related to privacy and abuse of the Aadhaar database.

Although the Supreme Court didn’t stop the process of enrolment under Aadhaar, a petitioner in the case who did not want to be identified said the enrolment cannot be forced or mandatory. “We have collected instances of the court’s order being violated and we will submit it to the court in the next hearing,” the petitioner said.

The idea of Aadhaar numbers, issued by UIDAI, was hatched during the rule of the United Progressive Alliance government. The project currently doesn’t have legislative backing.

HT Mint, New Delhi, 1st Oct. 2015